Oxford movement: An Overview
Oxford movement: An Overview
Oxford movement was a religious and literary movement
during the Victorian Age. It was centered at the University of Oxford. This
movement sought rebirth of Roman Catholic thoughts and practice within the
Church of England. Changes that took place in the relationship between the
state and the Church of England were the immediate cause of this Movement.
The major factor was the proposal of the Whig government to suppress half the Anglican
bishoprics and to pre-dispose their incomes, without first consulting the
Church. This created a wave of opposition, headed by John Keble, John Henry
Newman and several others.
John
Henry Newman dated the beginning of the Oxford movement to Keble’s Assize
Sermon of July 1833, on National Apostasy. Other major figures associated with
this movement were Richard Hurrell Froude, Frederick Faber, Isaac Williams,
Charles Marriott, Bernard Dalgairns, William Ward, and Edward Bouverie Pusey.
Although these all writers and intellectuals were associated with this movement
yet John Henry Newman and John Keble played an important in the emergence of
this movement.
Although
it was a religious movement, its main connection with literature was the series
of doctrinal papers setting forth the aims and teachings of the movement. These
were known as the ‘Tracts for the Times’. They were a series of 90 theological
publications produced by the members of the Oxford movement and edited by John
Newman. John Newman himself contributed twenty-four tracts. Writer WH Hutton
says in this context-“The Oxford movement certainly belongs to the history of
English religion more definitely than to the history of English literature; but
it had great influence, outside its own definite members on the literary taste
of its age.”
Some followers of this movement moved closer to the
beliefs of the Roman Catholic Church and their ideas developed controversies.
Newman joined the Roman Catholic Church in 1845 and subsequently, several others
also joined the Catholic Church. Keble and Pusey were active leaders of this
movement which gradually spread its influence throughout the Church of England.
Its result came in the form of increased use of ceremony and ritual in Church
worship, the establishment of Anglican monastic communities for men and for
women, and better-educated clergy who were more concerned with the pastoral care of
their Church members.
Different
groups were present in the Church of England at the beginning of the nineteenth
century. Many people saw themselves as latitudinarian or liberal in an attempt
to broaden the Church’s appeal. These people were related to high office.
Conversely, many clergies in the parishes were Evangelicals, as a result of the
revival led by John Wesley. During this, the universities became the breeding
ground for a movement to restore liturgical and devotional customs which
borrowed majorly from traditions before the English Reformation as well as
contemporary Roman Catholic traditions.
The immediate cause for this movement was a perceived attack by the reforming Whig
administration on the structure and revenues of the Church of Ireland, with the
Irish Church Temporalities Bill (1833). This Bill not only legalized
administrative changes of the hierarchy of the church but also made changes to
the leasing of Church lands, which some feared would result in a secular
appropriation of ecclesiastical property. John Keble criticized these proposals
as National Apostasy in his Assize Sermon in Oxford in 1833. The Tractarians
criticized this concept of theological liberalism.
The Tractarians contended the Branch Theory, which says that
Anglicanism along with Orthodoxy and Roman Catholicism form three branches of
the historic Church. Tractarians debated for the inclusion of traditional
aspects of liturgy from medieval religious practice, as they believed the
church had become too plain. Newman argued in the final tract ‘tract 90’ that
the doctrines of the Roman Catholic Church, as defined by the Council of Trent,
were compatible with the thirty-nine articles of the 16th-century church of England.
This movement was
criticized for being a ‘Romanising’ tendency, but it began to influence the
theory and practice of Anglicanism more broadly. The Oxford Movement was also
criticized for being both secretive and collusive.
The Oxford movement established the Anglican religious orders, both of men and of women.
It unified ideas and practices related to the practice of liturgy and ceremony
to unite more powerful emotional symbolism in the Church. It brought the
insight of the liturgical movement into the life of the church. The effects of
this movement were so widespread that the Eucharist gradually became more
central to worship, vestments became common, and numerous Roman Catholic
practices were re-introduced into worship. This caused to controversies within
churches that resulted in court cases, as in the dispute about ritualism.
Many
Tractarian priests began working in slums because bishops refused to give
livings to them. From their new ministries, they developed a critique of British
social policy, both local and national. One of the results was the
establishment of the Christian Social Union, of which several bishops were
members, where issues such as the just wage, the system of property renting,
infant mortality and industrial conditions were debated. The more radical
Catholic Crusade was a much smaller organization than the Oxford movement.
Anglo-Catholicism, as this complex of ideas, styles and organizations became
known, had a significant influence on global Anglicanism.
One of the major writers and proponents of
Tractarianism was John Henry Newman, a famous Oxford priest who, after writing
his final tract ‘Tract 90’, became convinced that the Branch Theory was
inadequate. Thinks that Tractarianism was a distinguished Roman Catholic
movement were not unfounded; Newman believed that the Roman and Anglican
churches were wholly compatible. He was entered into the Roman Catholic Church
in 1845 and was ordained a priest of the Church the same year. He later became
a cardinal.
Writing on the end of Tractarianism as a
movement, Newman stated:
I saw indeed clearly that my place in the Movement was lost;
public confidence was at an end; my occupation was gone. It was simply an impossibility
that I could say anything henceforth to good effect, when I had been posted up
by the marshal on the buttery-hatch of every College of my University, after
the manner of discommend pastry-cooks, and when in every part of the country
and every class of society, through every organ and opportunity of opinion, in
newspapers, in periodicals, at meetings, in pulpits, at dinner-tables, in
coffee-rooms, in railway carriages, I was denounced as a traitor who had laid
his train and was detected in the very act of firing it against the time-honored
Establishment.
Nice
ReplyDelete